From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Rini Dutta <rinid(at)rocketmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: how critical is WAL |
Date: | 2001-02-22 20:17:09 |
Message-ID: | 200102222017.PAA13030@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Hi,
>
> I happenned to come across the following in the
> documentation on WAL implementation in v7.1 -
>
> *****************************************************
> Before WAL, any crash during writing could result in:
>
> 1.index tuples pointing to non-existent table rows
>
> 2.index tuples lost in split operations
>
> 3.totally corrupted table or index page content,
> because of partially written data pages
> *****************************************************
Indexes could get corrupt, requiring rebuilding. That problem is gone
with WAL. Transaction commits where always safe.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lonnie Cumberland | 2001-02-22 20:25:38 | Re: www-sql question |
Previous Message | Rini Dutta | 2001-02-22 19:57:15 | how critical is WAL |