Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, peter(dot)schmidt(at)prismedia(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance
Date: 2001-02-19 16:50:02
Message-ID: 200102191650.LAA03334@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

I did not realize how much WAL improved performance when using fsync.

> > "Schmidt, Peter" <peter(dot)schmidt(at)prismedia(dot)com> writes:
> > > So, is it OK to use commit_delay=0?
> >
> > Certainly. In fact, I think that's about to become the default ;-)
>
> I agree with Tom. I did some benchmarking tests using pgbench for a
> computer magazine in Japan. I got a almost equal or better result for
> 7.1 than 7.0.3 if commit_delay=0. See included png file.
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-19 17:15:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-19 08:15:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-02-19 16:54:48 Re: floating point representation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-19 16:24:33 Re: floating point representation