Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: peter(dot)schmidt(at)prismedia(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance
Date: 2001-02-17 06:46:35
Message-ID: 20010217154635M.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

> "Schmidt, Peter" <peter(dot)schmidt(at)prismedia(dot)com> writes:
> > So, is it OK to use commit_delay=0?
>
> Certainly. In fact, I think that's about to become the default ;-)

I agree with Tom. I did some benchmarking tests using pgbench for a
computer magazine in Japan. I got a almost equal or better result for
7.1 than 7.0.3 if commit_delay=0. See included png file.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

Attachment Content-Type Size
image/png 4.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-17 06:59:59 Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-17 06:10:38 Re: v7.1b4 bad performance

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-17 06:59:59 Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-17 06:10:38 Re: v7.1b4 bad performance