Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay
Date: 2001-02-18 16:56:10
Message-ID: 20010218105610.B23980@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [010218 10:53]:
> Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> writes:
> > fdatasync() is available on Tru64 and according to the man-page behaves
> > as Tom expects. So it should be a win for us.
>
> Careful ... HPUX's man page also claims that fdatasync does something
> useful, but it doesn't. I'd recommend an experiment. Does today's
> snapshot run any faster for you (without -F) than before?
BTW, UnixWare 7.1.1 does *NOT* have fdatasync. What standard created
this one?

>
> regards, tom lane
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerome Vouillon 2001-02-18 16:59:24 Re: WAL and commit_delay
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-18 16:51:50 Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay