Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay
Date: 2001-02-18 16:51:50
Message-ID: 12206.982515110@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> writes:
> fdatasync() is available on Tru64 and according to the man-page behaves
> as Tom expects. So it should be a win for us.

Careful ... HPUX's man page also claims that fdatasync does something
useful, but it doesn't. I'd recommend an experiment. Does today's
snapshot run any faster for you (without -F) than before?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2001-02-18 16:56:10 Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay
Previous Message Matthew Kirkwood 2001-02-18 13:01:03 Re: Linux 2.2 vs 2.4