Re: Idea for reducing planning time

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea for reducing planning time
Date: 2000-12-15 19:27:10
Message-ID: 200012151927.OAA24736@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Totally agree. In the old days, we posted all our patches to the list
> > so people could see. We used to make cvs commits only on the main
> > server, so we had the patch handy, and it made sense to post it. Now
> > that we have remote cvs, we don't do it as much, but in this case, cvs
> > diff -c is a big help.
>
> If you like I'll post the patch, but it strikes me as a waste of list
> bandwidth --- anyone who is likely to actually review it is perfectly
> capable of doing cvs diff for themselves ...

Posting patch is only useful if you want people to review it. They are
more likely to if you send it to patches, already diff'ed. In fact, how
do you pull out a patch set from CVS? You have to use -D and specify a
date/time range, right?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-12-15 19:33:26 RE: Idea for reducing planning time
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-15 19:08:49 Re: Idea for reducing planning time