From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Idea for reducing planning time |
Date: | 2000-12-15 19:45:14 |
Message-ID: | 13110.976909514@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> If you like I'll post the patch, but it strikes me as a waste of list
>> bandwidth --- anyone who is likely to actually review it is perfectly
>> capable of doing cvs diff for themselves ...
> Posting patch is only useful if you want people to review it. They are
> more likely to if you send it to patches, already diff'ed. In fact, how
> do you pull out a patch set from CVS? You have to use -D and specify a
> date/time range, right?
That's a good point --- there doesn't seem to be any real easy way of
extracting a set of changes to different files except to use -D. And
even that doesn't do anything to separate unrelated patches applied at
about the same time.
For the record, you can get a diff of this kind with a command like
cvs diff -c -D '2000-12-14 17:00' -D '2000-12-14 18:00'
executed in the top level of the tree you want to search.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-15 19:56:48 | TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing planning time) |
Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2000-12-15 19:33:26 | RE: Idea for reducing planning time |