Re: UNION within VIEW workarounds?

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)pl>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UNION within VIEW workarounds?
Date: 2000-12-08 09:26:32
Message-ID: 20001208102632.A28802@gruby
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 07:45:02PM -0600, Ed Loehr wrote:
> One advantage is that you can hide internal db schema from applications
> that may need to access your db. That frees you to change the internal
> schema somewhat as long as you honor the agreed "interface" of the
> view...

another advantage is that at some point of time when you need greater
performance on select's you can change your views to physical tables
regenerated from time to time.

depesz

--
hubert depesz lubaczewski
------------------------------------------------------------------------
najwspanialszą rzeczą jaką dało nam nowoczesne społeczeństwo,
jest niesamowita wręcz łatwość unikania kontaktów z nim ...

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Denis Perchine 2000-12-08 10:01:48 My patches are now on a webpage.
Previous Message Juriy Goloveshkin 2000-12-08 07:38:33 ilike and --enable-multibyte=KOI8