Re: VERY SLOW UPDATES

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
To: "Grembowicz, Kenneth" <GrembowiczK(at)NAVO(dot)NAVY(dot)MIL>
Cc: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VERY SLOW UPDATES
Date: 2000-08-18 16:17:15
Message-ID: 20000818091714.P4854@fw.wintelcom.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

* Grembowicz, Kenneth <GrembowiczK(at)NAVO(dot)NAVY(dot)MIL> [000818 09:08] wrote:
> This is my situation...
> My table has about 1.6 million records.
> I am trying to use the update command to insert new data.
> However, it is extremely slow--about 2 to 4 seconds per update.
> You can see my problem is I am trying to update 40,000 records.
> Any insight or suggestion would be appreciated.
> -Ken
>
> PS I am currently wrapping my updates in a transaction block and indexes
> have been dropped.

I think that dropping indexes might be a bad idea particularly
since the update must search for the row to be updated and probably
is forced to do a sequential scan. I would put the index on the
row of your UPDATE's where clause.

-Alfred

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Mercer 2000-08-18 16:30:12 vacuum/re-index vs. vacuum with indexes
Previous Message David Shrewsbury 2000-08-18 15:47:19 vacuum messages