From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Odd release numbers for development versions? |
Date: | 2000-06-06 16:07:02 |
Message-ID: | 200006061607.MAA27510@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Is PostgreSQL going to start using odd release numbers for development
> versions? This is how the Linux kernel is, and some other projects.
>
> Version.release.revision/build
>
> Like 7.0.x would be the current stable branch. 7.1.x, the current development
> branch. The next stable branch would be 7.2.x. Within the current even
> release stable branch, maybe only do bug fixes. In the odd dev releases, focus
> on new/experiemental. Both branches could have very frequent *.x
> revisions/builds. I guess you'd have to apply patches to both branches
> sometimes, like when a bug is found in 7.0.x, it is patched and the same patch
> applied to the 7.1.x if needed.
>
> This way there would be a clear distinction for users what is likely to be good
> for production use and what is still unproven.
No even/odd mess. Every release is stable.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-06-06 16:07:44 | Protection of debugging options |
Previous Message | Robert B. Easter | 2000-06-06 15:34:36 | Odd release numbers for development versions? |