| From: | Brian E Gallew <geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Berkeley DB license |
| Date: | 2000-05-16 16:33:17 |
| Message-ID: | 200005161633.MAA24756@smtp3.andrew.cmu.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Then <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> spoke up and said:
> In the end, we may find that the needs of a database for storage are
> different enough that SDB would not be a win, but I think it is worth
> exploring to see if that is true.
Actually, there are other possibilities, too. As a for-instance, it
might be interesting to see what a reiserfs-based storage manager
looks/performs like.
--
=====================================================================
| JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia. |
| After all, why else would it support only single inheritance?? |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek(at)cmu(dot)edu for my public key. |
=====================================================================
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-05-16 16:38:57 | RE: Actually it's a bufmgr issue (was Re: Another pg_listener issue) |
| Previous Message | Michael A. Olson | 2000-05-16 16:27:11 | Re: Berkeley DB license |