| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
| Date: | 2000-05-05 05:15:17 |
| Message-ID: | 200005050515.BAA12443@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> That's a fair objection for the LIKE estimator, which after all hasn't
> gotten much testing. I'll leave well enough alone there. But those
> missing ODBC functions are just another dozen SQL-function entries for
> pg_proc; hard to see how they can break anything else, even if (worst
> case) they're wrong themselves ...
Agreed on the ODBC.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-05 05:16:06 | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-05 05:14:52 | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |