Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date: 2000-05-05 05:14:52
Message-ID: 200005050514.BAA12421@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> >> Can you say "one more initdb"? I knew you could...
>
> > Would a pg_upgrade fix this, or do I have to do a whole dump/reload?
>
> pg_upgrade *should* work, but if I were you I'd make a backup dump
> first, just in case. I don't trust pg_upgrade very much...

Aw, badmouthing pg_upgrade again. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-05 05:15:17 Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-05 05:09:03 Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?