Re: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1
Date: 2000-02-24 16:26:26
Message-ID: 200002241626.LAA26986@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> > - It fails to reload datetime indexes, because of "DefineIndex: datetime_ops
> > class not found".
>
> Oops. Comparing 6.5 and current pg_opclass contents, I see we are going
> to have this trouble with timespan_ops and oid8_ops as well as with
> datetime_ops (although very likely there are no user tables with indexes
> on oid8? Not certain though).
>
> Bruce, do you want to hack the parser to drop these opclass names the
> same way it's dropping network_ops? Or do we need to adopt a cleaner
> solution?

Doing it now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Post Message 2000-02-24 16:32:00 Solid time
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-24 16:25:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0