Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rolf Grossmann <grossman(at)securitas(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Date: 2000-02-24 16:25:42
Message-ID: 200002241625.LAA26974@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

> On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > Perhaps this is a good time to ask when and how any fix to this should be
> > > applied.
> >
> > This is arguably a bug fix, so you needn't worry about it being beta
> > phase.
>
> I'm not sure how this works now: Do I just commit it to the tree, so it
> will be in when, say, beta2 gets generated?

Betas are not static releases. We live in beta for over a month, with
people making changes to fix user problems.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-24 16:42:06 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-02-24 16:13:51 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-24 16:26:26 Re: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1
Previous Message Post Message 2000-02-24 16:20:16 Solid timer