Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems
Date: 2000-02-16 16:39:48
Message-ID: 200002161639.LAA02621@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Actually, the point of including c.h (plus postgres_ext.h) rather than
> postgres.h was to not have access to the backend internal stuff, so as to
> keep the separation clean. But it doesn't really matter to me. Also, on my
> system at least, there were no redundant includes. I actually went through
> each library call and put in exactly the includes the man page mentioned.

Yes, I suspected that was your purpose. I couldn't find any other areas
where c.h was used, so I figured I may as well make it standard, and if
we want to make it separate, we would have to do most of bin and
interfaces, and that would be a separate job.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-16 16:52:11 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres meets InterBase (ZDNet)
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2000-02-16 16:34:27 Re: [HACKERS] parser changes