Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856
Date: 2000-02-02 06:31:10
Message-ID: 200002020631.BAA17577@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 09:34:17PM -0800, Don Baccus wrote:
> > At 10:52 PM 2/1/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> <deleted to save having to read that again>
>
> Ah Don, that's a little harsh, isn't it? Did Peter's actions in checking in
> code lose you one minutes work, either time? I seem to recall that your not
> tracking the CVS (which you shouldn't). So your basically bitching about
> _theoretical_ problems? Tom, as a core developer, is directly affected,
> and has earned the right to chew out Peter. You, on the other hand, are
> a kibitzer here, as am I. Your comments in technical discussions lead
> me to believe that you are a professional developer, but you haven't
> stepped up to the plate for postgresql, yet, and submitted code. Let the
> current core developers deal with this: we all know your position!

This is excellent advise.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-02 06:57:10 Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-02 06:23:32 Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856