Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856
Date: 2000-02-02 06:21:21
Message-ID: 20000202002121.A13476@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 09:34:17PM -0800, Don Baccus wrote:
> At 10:52 PM 2/1/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
<deleted to save having to read that again>

Ah Don, that's a little harsh, isn't it? Did Peter's actions in checking in
code lose you one minutes work, either time? I seem to recall that your not
tracking the CVS (which you shouldn't). So your basically bitching about
_theoretical_ problems? Tom, as a core developer, is directly affected,
and has earned the right to chew out Peter. You, on the other hand, are
a kibitzer here, as am I. Your comments in technical discussions lead
me to believe that you are a professional developer, but you haven't
stepped up to the plate for postgresql, yet, and submitted code. Let the
current core developers deal with this: we all know your position!

Ross

--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-02 06:23:32 Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-02-02 06:07:50 Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856