Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Date: 2000-01-16 06:44:37
Message-ID: 200001160644.BAA09781@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I have applied a patch for this one.
>
> Right, you saw the parser_typecast mistake. But the problem of doing
> it properly for non-constant input to the CAST is still open.
>

Yes, and constants with cases in SELECT INTO are broken too.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kristofer Munn 2000-01-16 06:57:41 Temp Tables: Trying to delete a reldesc...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-16 06:25:58 Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST