Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Date: 2000-01-16 06:25:58
Message-ID: 19745.948003958@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have applied a patch for this one.

Right, you saw the parser_typecast mistake. But the problem of doing
it properly for non-constant input to the CAST is still open.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-16 06:44:37 Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-16 05:40:49 Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST