Re: [HACKERS] Uninstalling PostgreSQL ??!!

From: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Stephen Birch <sbirch(at)ironmountainsystems(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uninstalling PostgreSQL ??!!
Date: 2000-01-14 21:56:18
Message-ID: 200001142156.VAA30386@linda.lfix.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Birch wrote:
>Does the PostgreSQL project officially only support Red Hat - I sure would l
>ike to see SuSE supported and
>mentioned instead of just Red hat. I'd be happy to generate SuSE RPMs for d
>istribution via the PostgreSQL
>site.
>
>I thought I saw some discussion about this issue earlier.
>
>Who generates the SuSE rpms distributed with the SuSE release. These are of
> no value to me because I wish
>to use /usr/local/pgsql for PostgreSQL.

If you generate RPMs for SUSE, rather than just for your own use, you will
surely need to conform to their policy. I should be most surprised if
that allowed their RPMs to use /usr/local, which should be for the local
administrator rather than for the distribution.

That is, of course, why Red Hat's RPMs and Debian's packages relocate
PostgreSQL into directories that conform to those distributions'
policies.

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
========================================
"For the LORD is good; his mercy is everlasting; and
his truth endureth to all generations."
Psalms 100:5

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-01-14 22:11:02 descriptions on operators
Previous Message Keith Harmon 2000-01-14 21:37:11 FW: licensing and support