Re: is_superuser is not documented

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: is_superuser is not documented
Date: 2023-04-03 14:47:48
Message-ID: 1ae53ec3-5c32-7196-59cb-568640c01a2c@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023/04/01 22:34, Joseph Koshakow wrote:
> The patch updated the guc table for is_superuser in
> src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c

Yes, this patch moves the descriptions of is_superuser to config.sgml
and changes its group to PRESET_OPTIONS.

> However, when I look at the code on master I don't see this update

Yes, the patch has not been committed yet because of lack of review comments.
Do you have any review comments on this patch?
Or you think it's ready for committer?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2023-04-03 14:49:43 Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2023-04-03 14:45:39 Re: daitch_mokotoff module