Re: daitch_mokotoff module

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dag Lem <dag(at)nimrod(dot)no>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: daitch_mokotoff module
Date: 2023-04-03 14:45:39
Message-ID: 037c6b65-019e-7e4b-4fd0-77973ea75a9f@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/3/23 15:19, Dag Lem wrote:
> Dag Lem <dag(at)nimrod(dot)no> writes:
>
>> I sincerely hope this resolves any blocking issues with copyright /
>> legalese / credits.
>>
>
> Can this now be considered ready for commiter, so that Paul or someone
> else can flip the bit?
>

Hi, I think from the technical point of view it's sound and ready for
commit. The patch stalled on the copyright/credit stuff, which is
somewhat separate and mostly non-technical aspect of patches. Sorry for
that, I'm sure it's annoying/frustrating :-(

I see the current patch has two simple lines:

* This module was originally sponsored by Finance Norway /
* Trafikkforsikringsforeningen, and implemented by Dag Lem

Any objections to this level of attribution in commnents?

regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2023-04-03 14:47:48 Re: is_superuser is not documented
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-04-03 14:34:20 Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner