| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
| Date: | 2024-05-16 18:26:08 |
| Message-ID: | 1a8ec76a863539ec2f849f247ee0e99dff8303e2.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2024-05-16 at 05:25 -0400, Corey Huinker wrote:
>
> Per previous comments, it was suggested by others that:
>
> - having them in SECTION_NONE was a grave mistake
> - Everything that could belong in SECTION_DATA should, and the rest
> should be in SECTION_POST_DATA
I don't understand the gravity of the choice here: what am I missing?
To be clear: I'm not arguing against it, but I'd like to understand it
better. Perhaps it has to do with the relationship between the sections
and the dependencies?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-05-16 18:30:03 | commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-05-16 17:47:37 | Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] pg_upgrade can result in early wraparound on databases with high transaction load |