Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal
Date: 2018-08-06 19:30:18
Message-ID: 1F8EA64B-695C-4893-A436-B655C840788D@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs


> On Aug 6, 2018, at 3:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
>> Hm, so the only objection I can think of is that this results in the old
>> release notes only being available on the website; there's no other way
>> to access them, short of digging around in the git repo. But maybe that's
>> enough.
>
> Actually, a concrete reason why that might not be good is that it results
> in having a single point of failure: once we remove branch N's relnotes
> from the active branches, the only copy of that data is the one in the
> archive table the docload script is filling. Given, say, a bug in the
> docload script that causes it to overwrite the wrong table entries,
> can we recover?

Well, the release notes are still in the git history as well as the tarballs.
One could always pull an older tarball of PostgreSQL with the full
release.sgml and load from there.

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-08-06 19:37:45 Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-06 19:27:35 Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal