| From: | Randall Lucas <rlucas(at)tercent(dot)net> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Teter <michael_teter(at)yahoo(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: UNIQUE boolean: only one row may be "true" | 
| Date: | 2003-05-06 18:46:51 | 
| Message-ID: | 19ACA479-7FF3-11D7-A71E-000A957653D6@tercent.net | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql | 
Hi Michael,
Per Bruno's suggestion, I think I will go with a partial index.  But 
your question brings up a good point and I am happy to hear what you 
have to say on the design.
The problem being solved is essentially replicating a very limited 
subset of SQL DDL to describe an external tabular dataset.  For a given 
dataset (thing_group) consisting of a number of columns (thing), there 
must be no more than one column which is a primary key 
(is_main_thing_p).  Do you have any suggestions on how this might 
better be implemented?  It seems to me that with a partial index, there 
is not too much overhead and it doesn't seem too offensively 
un-boycecoddean.
Best,
Randall
On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 01:13 PM, Michael Teter wrote:
> Can you elaborate a little on what you want to do with this (as in, 
> example
> data, problem domain, etc.)?
>
> This is probably not the answer you're looking for, but without 
> knowing more,
> I would guess that you need a different design, not a 1-true,many 
> false field
> constraint.
>
> Perhaps you want something like this?
>
> Table A:
> thing_groupid (primary key)
> ...other group info...
>
> Table B:
> thing_groupid (reference to A.thing_groupid, many to 1)
> thing_id
> ...details about thing...
>
> ?
>
> MT
>
> --- Randall Lucas <rlucas(at)tercent(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> After a late night of SQL hacking, my brain fizzed out:
>>
>> How shall I create a constraint such that only one row may be 'true'?
>> Rephrased, may I place a WHERE clause in a UNIQUE constraint, or
>> alternatively, may I use a CHECK constraint with an aggregate?
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> CREATE TABLE thing (
>>   thing_id 			serial primary key,
>>   thing_group_id 	int not null references thing_group(thing_group_id),
>>   is_main_thing_p 	boolean not null default 'f',
>> -- there may be only one main thing per group:
>>   unique (thing_group_id, is_main_thing_p='t')
>> -- or else something like:
>> -- check (count (*) from thing where 
>> thing_group_id=NEW.thing_group_id 
>> and is_main_thing_p = 't' <2)
>> );
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Randall
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of 
>> broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> http://search.yahoo.com
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2003-05-06 18:46:54 | Re: pg_ ? | 
| Previous Message | Rado Petrik | 2003-05-06 18:24:42 | Utils/case for create relation db under Linux |