Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump table order

> Better idea: make pg_dump smarter, so that it sorts the tables by name
> as far as possible without breaking inheritance and membership
> dependencies. It already retrieves the inheritance graph, and it could
> certainly figure column-type dependencies too. I don't think anyone
> would object to producing the output in a more meaningful order, so
> I see no need for a switch if you can make this work.
>
> I used to know enough about topological sorts to sketch how this ought
> to work, but that was years ago :-(. I do see that the simplest
> approach to a sort comparison function, "if a depends on b then say a>b,
> else say result of comparing name(a) and name(b)", will not work because
> it's not transitive.

I now someone fixed some of that recently, and I thought it was in 6.5.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026