Re: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes
Date: 1999-09-13 15:16:25
Message-ID: 199909131516.LAA16956@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The goal used to be a major release every three months, but we haven't
> met that in some time. And, since it seems like we are now putting
> out major releases in order to do significant upgrades and not just
> incremental stability improvements, I kinda think that a slower cycle
> (six-month intervals, say) might be a more useful goal at this stage.
> Has the core group thought about this issue lately?

I got a good laugh on this one. That we actually planned ahead... :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-13 15:35:53 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump table order
Previous Message Ansley, Michael 1999-09-13 15:15:50 RE: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes