Re: [HACKERS] Curiosity on deferred/delayed balancing btrees

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: colin(at)field(dot)medicine(dot)adelaide(dot)edu(dot)au
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Curiosity on deferred/delayed balancing btrees
Date: 1999-08-03 16:19:42
Message-ID: 199908031619.MAA06029@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hi,
>
> This is idle curiosity, I was looking through some papers I found on deferred
> balancing of btrees, with the idea of implementing it (for coldstore.)
>
> The idea is that you only need to lock a couple of pages for update, and you
> come back later to rebalance the tree.
>
> Someone suggested postgresql already does this. Is it so? If so, would
> someone give me a quick precis on the subject?

I think we do. We have nbtree, whatever that is.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 1999-08-03 16:20:19 RE: [HACKERS] Threads
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-08-03 16:19:13 Re: [HACKERS] Threads