Re: [HACKERS] Threads

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Duane Currie <dcurrie(at)sandman(dot)acadiau(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Threads
Date: 1999-08-03 16:19:13
Message-ID: 199908031619.MAA06021@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 02:18:07PM +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > As well, a few have been asking about multi-threading.
> > > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Threads within a client backend might be interesting. [...]
>
> Hmm, what about threads in the frontend? Anyone know if libpq is thread
> safe, and if not, how hard it might be to make it so?
>

I believe it is thread-safe.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-08-03 16:19:42 Re: [HACKERS] Curiosity on deferred/delayed balancing btrees
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-08-03 16:13:55 Re: [HACKERS] Threads