Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
Date: 1999-06-18 02:30:31
Message-ID: 199906180230.WAA12112@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Unlinking unused segments after truncating to zero length may cause
> the result such as
>
> Existent backends write to the truncated file to extend the relation
> while new backends create a new segment file to extend the relation.

How about my idea of creating a truncated file, the renaming it to the
table file. That keeps the table open for other open file descriptors,
but put a zero-length file in place in an atomic manner.

Fact is that the current code is really bad, so I request you do your
best, and let's get it in there for people to review and improve if
necessary.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-06-18 02:31:02 Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1999-06-18 02:28:58 Re: [HACKERS] This is weird