Re: [HACKERS] Release date and docs

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Release date and docs
Date: 1999-06-01 14:46:32
Message-ID: 199906011446.KAA26684@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> It's pretty nice having this run daily, because I get the cron log of
> the run and can see when something new breaks the build from sgml.
>
> > If you don't want to change our distribution practices to the extent
> > of having separate source-code and doc tarfiles, then it'd at least be
> > a good idea to regenerate the derived docs as part of the nightly
> > snapshot-building run, so that the snapshots contain up-to-date derived
> > files rather than historical artifacts...
>
> Good idea, but we don't want to do CVS updates on those big tar files.
>
> What do other folks think??

I like the current setup.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-06-01 14:49:30 Re: [HACKERS] Problems w/ LO
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-01 14:45:13 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length