From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list |
Date: | 1999-05-18 15:19:21 |
Message-ID: | 199905181519.LAA27032@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >>>> * change the library/backend interface to use network byte order
> >>
> >> Is there something I'm missing? This has been true for a long while...
> >
> > People have mentioned we should make the change, but it will require a
> > new protocol, so it hasn't moved from the list.
>
> But my point is the current protocol *already* uses network byte order.
Oh. Item removed.
> IIRC the old "version 0" protocol did not, but that's ancient history.
> Either this complaint is long obsolete, or I don't understand what's
> being asked for.
I think you are right. Someone added code to serve both orders based on
the version of the client, I think, and newer clients use the proper
order.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-05-18 17:32:06 | Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-05-18 15:18:16 | Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? |