Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
Date: 1999-05-18 15:00:19
Message-ID: 19335.927039619@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>>> * change the library/backend interface to use network byte order
>>
>> Is there something I'm missing? This has been true for a long while...
>
> People have mentioned we should make the change, but it will require a
> new protocol, so it hasn't moved from the list.

But my point is the current protocol *already* uses network byte order.

IIRC the old "version 0" protocol did not, but that's ancient history.
Either this complaint is long obsolete, or I don't understand what's
being asked for.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-18 15:18:16 Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it?
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-05-18 14:56:25 I've got it, now should I commit it?