Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem
Date: 1999-05-15 08:59:37
Message-ID: 199905150859.EAA11308@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> > you can specify any option begins from --with-
> > configure will not complain about unknown option, just silently ignore it.
>
> This has always been true with every version of autoconf --- it's one of
> the less well designed aspects of autoconf IMHO. The GNU folk claim
> it's a feature, but I don't think so... (*)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> (*) their reasoning is that you can pass the same set of --with flags
> to every configure script in a large source tree without worrying about
> exactly which packages want which options. Perhaps that really is
> useful for building a ton of GNU tools together, but it sure hurts
> user-friendliness otherwise.

I totally agree. If they had an option to disregard unknown options
that would be OK, but never to make it the default.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-15 09:00:14 Re: [HACKERS] CVS
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-15 08:55:50 Re: [HACKERS] ADD COLUMN