| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem |
| Date: | 1999-05-14 14:46:04 |
| Message-ID: | 15198.926693164@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> you can specify any option begins from --with-
> configure will not complain about unknown option, just silently ignore it.
This has always been true with every version of autoconf --- it's one of
the less well designed aspects of autoconf IMHO. The GNU folk claim
it's a feature, but I don't think so... (*)
regards, tom lane
(*) their reasoning is that you can pass the same set of --with flags
to every configure script in a large source tree without worrying about
exactly which packages want which options. Perhaps that really is
useful for building a ton of GNU tools together, but it sure hurts
user-friendliness otherwise.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Lundin | 1999-05-14 15:50:47 | Re: [HACKERS] CVS |
| Previous Message | Maarten Boekhold | 1999-05-14 14:40:35 | Re: [HACKERS] configure --with-xxxx problem |