Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails
Date: 1999-05-10 18:28:22
Message-ID: 199905101828.OAA04602@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Sun, 9 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > int addr = htonl(ntohl(ip_v4addr(ip)) | (0xffffffff >> ip_bits(ip)));
>
> There needs to be a UL on the end of that constant. Otherwise it depends
> on whether or not the compiler chooses to make it signed or unsigned. Not
> only that, but shifting by >=32 is undefined... Intel chipsets will go mod
> 32 and change 32 to 0.
>

Anyone want to supply a patch?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-10 18:33:54 Re: [HACKERS] GROUP BY fixes committed
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-05-10 18:27:27 Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal