| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | vadim(at)krs(dot)ru (Vadim Mikheev) |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans |
| Date: | 1999-02-15 02:38:43 |
| Message-ID: | 199902150238.VAA22429@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Can someone comment on what Bushy plans do in the optimizer, and whether
> > > the code has any value?
> >
> > If anyone wants to research this, the driving field appears to be
> > in JoinInfo called 'inactive', soon to be called bushy_inactive.
>
> No - BushyPlanFlag.
Yes, that enables Bushy Plans, but the work of bushy plans seems to be
driven by that field.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ryan Bradetich | 1999-02-15 02:53:42 | Is the int8_ops being implimented? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-02-15 02:37:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster |