Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: vadim(at)krs(dot)ru (Vadim Mikheev)
Cc: rbrad(at)hpb50023(dot)boi(dot)hp(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer is fixed, and faster
Date: 1999-02-15 02:37:14
Message-ID: 199902150237.VAA22396@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > This is exactly what I need. My testing is very limited. I basically
> > test the functionality, but not real-world samples. I am still working.
> > I will let everyone know when I am done, and you can throw any queries
> > at it.
> >
> > Was there a speedup with the new optimizer? Was the new plan faster?
> > The new optimizer uses 'cost' much more reliably. I hope our cost
> > estimates for various join types is accurate.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> No. It's ok for netsloop only.

That is bad. Can you tell someone how to compute those, so perhaps they
can give us accurate numbers.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-15 02:38:43 Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-02-15 02:36:24 Re: [HACKERS] bushy plans