Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Date: 1999-02-02 17:05:03
Message-ID: 199902021705.MAA27099@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Good question. I am done with temp tables, so Vadim makes the call on
> > when to start beta.
>
> Now I'm placing another LOCK request (waiting for Vadim).
>
> The problem with constraints in ExecRelCheck() I've just
> found not only affects COPY. It also occurs with
> INSERT...SELECT or big UPDATE's. Constraints with many
> affected tuples eat up backend memory quickly until out of
> swap space.
>
> This fix must go into CURRENT and REL6_4 before we release
> v6.5 or v6.4.3 either. There are actually reports from users
> not able to reload dumps made with v6.4.2.

You can keep applying fixes like this until near final release date. I
have patches in my mailbox to apply today too.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-02-02 18:36:11 Re: [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-02-02 16:55:47 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof