| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | robinson(at)public(dot)bta(dot)net(dot)cn (Michael Robinson) |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
| Date: | 1998-11-14 07:35:26 |
| Message-ID: | 199811140735.CAA21976@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >Current FE/BE protocol seems pretty optimized to me, but you should know
> >the best. Seems like a waste to try and get it to match some standard,
>
> Well, I suppose you could make the same argument about SQL-92 compliance.
>
> Standards compliance is useful because it plugs you into the positive-
> feedback cycle of product development. Your product works with more
> products, more people use your product, more products are developed which
> work with your product, etc.
Not really the same. There are end-user visible changes, and
developer-visible changes.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Constantin Teodorescu | 1998-11-14 09:07:59 | How to detect views objects ? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-11-14 07:34:04 | Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |