Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA

From: Michael Robinson <robinson(at)public(dot)bta(dot)net(dot)cn>
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Date: 1998-11-14 05:29:36
Message-ID: 199811140529.NAA24929@public.bta.net.cn
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>Current FE/BE protocol seems pretty optimized to me, but you should know
>the best. Seems like a waste to try and get it to match some standard,

Well, I suppose you could make the same argument about SQL-92 compliance.

Standards compliance is useful because it plugs you into the positive-
feedback cycle of product development. Your product works with more
products, more people use your product, more products are developed which
work with your product, etc.

-Michael Robinson

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-11-14 07:34:04 Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-11-14 05:18:40 Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA