From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] HAVING bug |
Date: | 1998-10-19 15:29:56 |
Message-ID: | 199810191529.LAA09868@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> PostgreSQL tells me, the following query is not valid, but I can't see
> nothing wrong.
>
> prova=> select * from sp;
> sno |pno |qty
> -----+-----+---
> S1 |P1 |300
> S1 |P2 |200
> S1 |P3 |400
> S2 |P2 |400
> S3 |P2 |200
> S4 |P4 |300
> S4 |P5 |400
> (7 rows)
>
> prova=> select sno,qty from sp group by sno,qty having qty=300;
> ERROR: This is not a valid having query!
HAVING is only to be used with aggregates. In your case, qty is not an
aggregate.
At least, that is what I think is supposed to happen.
>
> I tried the same query on Informix-SE and I have the following:
>
> sno qty
>
> S1 300.000
> S4 300.000
>
> I tried it also on Solid and I have the following:
>
> SOLID SQL Editor (teletype) v.02.20.0007
> select sno,qty from sp group by sno,qty having qty = 300;
> SNO QTY
> --- ---
> S1 300.
> S4 300.
> 2 rows fetched.
>
> Jose'
>
>
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sferacarta Software | 1998-10-19 16:12:49 | Re[2]: [HACKERS] using indexes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-10-19 15:27:30 | Re: AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... LIMIT (trial implementation) |