Re: [HACKERS] HAVING bug

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HAVING bug
Date: 1998-10-19 15:29:56
Message-ID: 199810191529.LAA09868@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> PostgreSQL tells me, the following query is not valid, but I can't see
> nothing wrong.
>
> prova=> select * from sp;
> sno |pno |qty
> -----+-----+---
> S1 |P1 |300
> S1 |P2 |200
> S1 |P3 |400
> S2 |P2 |400
> S3 |P2 |200
> S4 |P4 |300
> S4 |P5 |400
> (7 rows)
>
> prova=> select sno,qty from sp group by sno,qty having qty=300;
> ERROR: This is not a valid having query!

HAVING is only to be used with aggregates. In your case, qty is not an
aggregate.

At least, that is what I think is supposed to happen.

>
> I tried the same query on Informix-SE and I have the following:
>
> sno qty
>
> S1 300.000
> S4 300.000
>
> I tried it also on Solid and I have the following:
>
> SOLID SQL Editor (teletype) v.02.20.0007
> select sno,qty from sp group by sno,qty having qty = 300;
> SNO QTY
> --- ---
> S1 300.
> S4 300.
> 2 rows fetched.
>
> Jose'
>
>
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

  • HAVING bug at 1998-10-19 10:57:54 from Sferacarta Software

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sferacarta Software 1998-10-19 16:12:49 Re[2]: [HACKERS] using indexes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-19 15:27:30 Re: AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... LIMIT (trial implementation)