Re: AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... LIMIT (trial implementation)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at (Andreas Zeugswetter)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... LIMIT (trial implementation)
Date: 1998-10-19 15:27:30
Message-ID: 199810191527.LAA09854@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> > Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > What if someone wants the rows from 500 to the end. Should we allow
> > > the syntax to be:
> > > SELECT ... [LIMIT count] [OFFSET offset]
> > > LIMIT and OFFSET are independent.
> >
> > I like that syntax the best, but remember we are not inventing in
> > a green field here. Isn't this a feature that already exists in
> > other DBMs? We should probably copy their syntax, unless it's
> > truly spectacularly awful...
>
> Informix uses the following syntax, but does not have the offset feature:
>
> select first 100 * from table ....

I definitely don't like that syntax.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-19 15:29:56 Re: [HACKERS] HAVING bug
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-10-19 15:16:10 [Fwd: DocBook stylesheets 1.19 released]