From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at (Andreas Zeugswetter) |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Large objects names |
Date: | 1998-08-06 15:43:02 |
Message-ID: | 199808061543.LAA07868@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> >Currently, large objects are stored internally as xinv### and xinx###.
> >
> >I would like to rename this for 6.4 to be _lobject_### to prevent
> >namespace collisions, and make them clearer for administrators.
> >
> >However, this may cause problems for backward compatability for large
> >object users. As I see there are going to be other new large object
> >things in 6.4, it may not be an issue.
> >
> >Is is OK to rename them internally?
>
> How about giving them their own subdirectory large_object/_lob_###,
> then there would be no naming conflict ?
> Since all others call them LOB I would use _lob_### instead.
That would be interesting.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-06 15:52:39 | current CVS tree |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-06 15:41:06 | Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats |