| From: | Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | AW: [HACKERS] Large objects names |
| Date: | 1998-08-06 08:45:41 |
| Message-ID: | 01BDC128.03AEEC90@zeugswettera.user.lan.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>Currently, large objects are stored internally as xinv### and xinx###.
>
>I would like to rename this for 6.4 to be _lobject_### to prevent
>namespace collisions, and make them clearer for administrators.
>
>However, this may cause problems for backward compatability for large
>object users. As I see there are going to be other new large object
>things in 6.4, it may not be an issue.
>
>Is is OK to rename them internally?
How about giving them their own subdirectory large_object/_lob_###,
then there would be no naming conflict ?
Since all others call them LOB I would use _lob_### instead.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Zeugswetter | 1998-08-06 08:52:48 | AW: [HACKERS] Declare Cursor question again |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1998-08-06 06:32:44 | Re: [HACKERS] indexes and floats |