From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com |
Cc: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c) |
Date: | 1998-02-19 21:35:59 |
Message-ID: | 199802192135.QAA14741@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Bruce said:
> > > > > Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the
> > > > > 'grant' of a select, then we're fine?
> > > >
> > > > Yep, but can we do that in nine days, and be sure it is tested?
> > >
> > > Don't think so - not really hard tested.
> >
> > If you think you can get it in with light testing by the beta people,
> > Marc might bite on it.
>
> So I'll give it a try...
I have been hoping to get you back into the rewrite system so we can get
a feeling of what does and doesn't work properly there. Here is a good
excuse.
I did some work on it with aggregates and subselects, and cleaned up
some stuff.
--
Bruce Momjian
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Keith Parks | 1998-02-19 21:40:14 | ecpg error (19th Feb cvsup) |
Previous Message | Rick Windham | 1998-02-19 21:35:16 | New to PostgreSQL Question (Query Optimizer) |