| From: | Karl Denninger <karl(at)mcs(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Ralf Mattes <mattes(at)mhs(dot)uni-freiburg(dot)de>, Gyepi Sam <gsam(at)praxis-sw(dot)com>, Michael J Schout <mschout(at)mail(dot)gkg-com(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-questions(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [QUESTIONS] Arrays (inserting and removing) |
| Date: | 1998-01-15 15:34:14 |
| Message-ID: | 19980115093413.53188@mcs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 15, 1998 at 09:27:21AM +0700, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Ralf Mattes wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, i agree. Mike's implementation is the way to go in a traditional
> > > realtional db (BTW, a question about oids: lurking on this list
> > > i overheard the idea of dropping oids. This would break a lot
> > > of my code! What's the last word on this ?).
> >
> > The last we discussed in pgsql-hackers was that OIDs would not be
> > dropped...
>
> ..but would be optional.
>
> Vadim
>
OIDs are a bastardization of the relational model. If you have to keep
them, then do so, but their use should be SEVERELY discouraged.
--
--
Karl Denninger (karl(at)MCS(dot)Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
| NEW! K56Flex support on ALL modems
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-01-15 15:34:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux Journal article on PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-01-15 13:06:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Cannot build recent snapshot |