Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2018-11-11 01:11:34 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
>> Would it not be worth an Assert(!TupleDescAttr(tupleDesc, attnum -
>> 1)->attisdropped); so that we're more likely to discover any issues
>> where cached plans are not invalidated correctly?
> I don't think it'd really do much.
FWIW, I agree. We'd need assertions in many more places than this
if we wanted reasonable coverage on the point, and I doubt it's
worth the work.
regards, tom lane