| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: enable_joinremoval |
| Date: | 2010-03-29 19:55:28 |
| Message-ID: | 19848.1269892528@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
>>> users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of
>>> checking that.
>>
>> Uhh... they wont be in the explain output... Seems simple enough.
> That is exactly what I replied, though nobody felt that was a great
> answer.
Who complained about that exactly? It seems like a perfectly
appropriate answer to me.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-03-29 19:57:41 | Re: enable_joinremoval |
| Previous Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2010-03-29 19:54:57 | Re: enable_joinremoval |